1 |
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 02:24:22PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
2 |
> On 15 Dec 2015 09:31, William Hubbs wrote: |
3 |
> > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:05:07AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
4 |
> > > On 11 Dec 2015 14:16, Patrick McLean wrote: |
5 |
> > > > On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 15:37:48 -0600 William Hubbs wrote: |
6 |
> > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 09:04:47PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
7 |
> > > > > > >>>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2015, William Hubbs wrote: |
8 |
> > > > > > |
9 |
> > > > > Well, the OpenRC project is currently inconsistent about this, so the |
10 |
> > > > > intention is to make it consistent. |
11 |
> > > > > |
12 |
> > > > > The .c/.h files have file-scope licenses, but that isn't true for |
13 |
> > > > > everything in the project. |
14 |
> > > > > |
15 |
> > > > > I am willing to make the effort to do this, I was just wondering if |
16 |
> > > > > there are any legal pitfalls I need to worry about. |
17 |
> > > > > |
18 |
> > > > > My theory is I can probably use git to find out who all of the authors |
19 |
> > > > > are, and generate an Authors list from that information and from |
20 |
> > > > > looking at copyright notices. |
21 |
> > > > |
22 |
> > > > One concern about this is the possibility of copied code. If OpenRC |
23 |
> > > > ever copied code from other BSD licensed projects, then dropping the |
24 |
> > > > notice from the top of the file would be a violation of the upstream |
25 |
> > > > license. |
26 |
> > > |
27 |
> > > OpenRC isn't purely Gentoo copyright, so it's already a violation. |
28 |
> > > the majority of entries belong to Roy. |
29 |
> > |
30 |
> > I have no idea what you mean by "it's already a violation", and I'm not |
31 |
> > sure what Gentoo Copyright has to do with it. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> your description sounds like you want to run: |
34 |
> s/Copyright .*/Copyright OpenRC Authors/ |
35 |
> |
36 |
> i'm saying you can't do that |
37 |
|
38 |
That's the first part, the second part is to have an Authors file at |
39 |
the top level that lists all of the authors and refer to that in the |
40 |
copyright statement, see the license branch of the main github repo and |
41 |
let me know if this is legal. The site I linked seems to think so |
42 |
because I'm not deleting copyright attributions, just moving them around. |
43 |
|
44 |
> > Altering Copyright statements to try to claim Gentoo copyright would |
45 |
> > definitely be a violation, but that's not what I'm wanting to do. |
46 |
> |
47 |
> adding multiple entries isn't a problem and in fact could/should be done |
48 |
> in most openrc files at this time |
49 |
|
50 |
Multiple entries are what I want to get away from; it is a nightmare to |
51 |
maintain, and the vcs shows far better than you or I ever could |
52 |
which code belongs to who (see git blame). That is what the site I |
53 |
linked talks about. |
54 |
|
55 |
William |