| 1 |
On 22 April 2013 10:21, Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Sorry for bringing back this thread from the dead, but... |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 09:09:47 +0000 |
| 5 |
> Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
>> If there is at least one Gentoo developer in metadata.xml we assume |
| 8 |
>> the package is properly maintained by him so |
| 9 |
>> we never touch it. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Does this include herd ? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Up to you but it will help us track packages maintained by users so we |
| 15 |
can find another maintainer if they ever go MIA. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Now, these packages have proxy-maint as co-herd, and I'd prefer people |
| 19 |
> that are not familiar with ml (ebuilds have their set of specificities) |
| 20 |
> not to blindly commit packages because it's proxy-maintained. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I made it clear on my previous emails that we do not intend to touch |
| 23 |
packages maintained by other @gentoo people or herds unless |
| 24 |
proxy-maint is the only herd in metadata. If someone violated that, |
| 25 |
then it's best to inform him about this, in case he forgot. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Regards, |
| 29 |
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 30 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang |
Archives