| 1 |
m_ 2001-09-24 klockan 15.07 skrev Martin Schlemmer: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 2001-09-24 at 14:58, Martin Schlemmer wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Mon, 2001-09-24 at 14:25, Mikael Hallendal wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > Hi! |
| 5 |
> > > |
| 6 |
> > > I've brought up this issue before. The main reason for this is to be |
| 7 |
> > > able to say, I want all GNOME-stuff in /usr/local/gnome instead of |
| 8 |
> > > /opt/gnome (for example). |
| 9 |
> > > |
| 10 |
> > > However if we decide to move everything to /usr this won't be an issue |
| 11 |
> > > anymore. |
| 12 |
> > > |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > I know about that issue .. not entirely what i meant. Rather, if a app |
| 15 |
> > need to use the base dir for gnome, /opt/gnome as of current, why |
| 16 |
> > hardcode it into the ebuild as /opt/gnome, but not use $GNOME_PATH |
| 17 |
> > instead? If gnome need to be relocated in future, it will be much |
| 18 |
> > easier .... |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> So maybe i should read better the first time ... but I still think it is |
| 22 |
> a better practice now that all have to be changed anyhow ... |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
I agree with you. However I don't think that it will be needed because |
| 25 |
you don't have to give GNOME_PATH when everything is located in /usr. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
I'm waiting for the document about this rellocation to /usr to be |
| 28 |
finished before starting to move stuff. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Regards, |
| 31 |
Mikael Hallendal |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Mikael Hallendal |
| 36 |
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team Leader |
| 37 |
CodeFactory AB, Stockholm, Sweden |
Archives