| 1 |
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Steven J Long |
| 2 |
<slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 3 |
> The shifting nature of the arguments and the solutions makes me more |
| 4 |
> uncomfortable that this hasn't been thought through even with the amount of |
| 5 |
> feedback, and more importantly proper consideration to that feedback, |
| 6 |
> required for a GLEP, let alone a change to base Linux filesystem |
| 7 |
> specifications. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Keep in mind that the main proponents of this do not intend to issue |
| 11 |
any GLEPs (they don't use Gentoo), and they may or may not get around |
| 12 |
to changing FHS/etc. They just intend to "do it" - and to some extent |
| 13 |
they're already doing it. Unless projects like udev get forked, we're |
| 14 |
going there whether we want to or not - apparently a |
| 15 |
soon-to-be-introduced version of udev already breaks when /usr isn't |
| 16 |
mounted at boot. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
If people don't like this, they need to start writing code, otherwise |
| 19 |
they're going to get it by default... |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Rich |
Archives