1 |
Alastair Tse wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 12:15, MAL wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> |
5 |
>>a) possibly portage has a function to specify that access to |
6 |
>>/etc/gtk-2.0/gtk.immodules is allowed. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Thats a no no. Unless there is absolutely no way to patch that |
10 |
> behaviour. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> |
13 |
>>b) I provide a patch to the sources to stop this happening, then do it |
14 |
>>myself in the ebuild after install. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> |
17 |
> You have to patch that part out and make sure you can produce the same |
18 |
> effect during pkg_postinst() and also reverse the effect when you do |
19 |
> pkg_postrm() (if possible.) You need to test it pretty well to make sure |
20 |
> pkg_postinst() and pkg_postrm() works as expected, esp in regards |
21 |
> prefixing paths with ${ROOT} when writing files, etc. |
22 |
|
23 |
Thanks for the info, see what you think: |
24 |
|
25 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21953 |
26 |
|
27 |
Is it better to upload an ebuild as a .tar.bz2 with digests, patches |
28 |
etc. all included? |
29 |
|
30 |
Cheers, |
31 |
MAL |
32 |
|
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |