Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: aranea@×××××.de
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-libs/x265: x265-1.0.ebuild ChangeLog x265-1.2.ebuild x265-0.8.ebuild
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 07:04:18
Message-Id: 20140813090407.2185b569@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-libs/x265: x265-1.0.ebuild ChangeLog x265-1.2.ebuild x265-0.8.ebuild by Luis Ressel
1 On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 13:48:37 +0200
2 Luis Ressel <aranea@×××××.de> wrote:
3
4 > I think I'd rather go with the original workflow. Okay, perhaps
5 > package.masking -9999 is a bit uncommon and clutters package.mask, but
6 > it's not all *that* bad and it eases the workflow.
7
8 Depends on whose workflow you are referring to; it doesn't affect the
9 maintainer, but the clutter can be a pain if you attempt to keep the
10 p.mask size low. Having package.mask as a directory would be a solution
11 to this; however, there's not much other need for it to be a directory.
12
13 --
14 With kind regards,
15
16 Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
17 Gentoo Developer
18
19 E-mail address : TomWij@g.o
20 GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
21 GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature