Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Roy Wright <royw@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] *DEVELOPMENT* mail list, right?
Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2007 21:17:13
Message-Id: 46195B25.9050806@cisco.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] *DEVELOPMENT* mail list, right? by Jeffrey Gardner
1 Jeffrey Gardner wrote:
2 > Michael Cummings wrote:
3 >
4 >> So, fellow devs, what's new with development?
5 >>
6 >
7 > As for me, I'm fighting with jmol-11.0, an awesome java app that relies
8 > on a lot of bundled jars. I've been able to use local versions of:
9 >
10 > dev-java/ant-core
11 > dev-java/ant-contrib
12 > dev-java/commons-cli
13 > dev-java/itext
14 > dev-java/junit
15 > dev-java/gnu-jaxp
16 > dev-java/sax
17 > dev-java/saxon
18 >
19 > ..but finding sources I can use for the following jars has been kicking
20 > my butt:
21 >
22 > Acme.jar
23 >
24
25 http://www.acme.com/resources/classes/Acme.tar.gz
26
27 > netscape.jar
28
29 I think this is a really old and obsolete jar. I found this thread
30 which might be relevant:
31
32 http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/t140950-package-netscapejavascript-does-not-exist.html
33
34 > vecmath1.2-1.14.jar (free version hosted by debian...it's looking better
35 > and better every day :D)
36 >
37 This is an older version of part of the the java3D project.
38 https://vecmath.dev.java.net/
39
40 In portage as dev-java/sun-java3d-bin
41 /usr/share/sun-java3d-bin/lib/vecmath.jar
42
43 Note, portage only has 1.3.2 and 1.4.0_pre5
44
45 > Anyway, that's where I'm at....
46 > Hope y'all are having better luck!!!
47 >
48 > je_fro
49 >
50
51 --
52 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list