| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
To summarize |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
- There's no known bugs in eudev that are not in udev |
| 6 |
- There's no bug that would be fixed by switch from eudev to udev |
| 7 |
- There's no new feature that would change eudev to udev bring |
| 8 |
- Currently musl and glibc profiles uses common eudev, after change we |
| 9 |
whould have musl profile users use something that glibc users are not using |
| 10 |
- You don't like the original decision to switch to eudev so you want |
| 11 |
now to use uno reverse card. |
| 12 |
- eudev have single maintainer, but so far it did not had negative |
| 13 |
impact on Gentoo |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I see no reason to switch to sys-fs/udev by default, up until there's |
| 16 |
actually a technical reason behind it. The eudev is a thing because |
| 17 |
systemd upstream made it clear that they have no intention into keeping |
| 18 |
udev operational unless it runs under systemd, which is quite important |
| 19 |
here. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- Piotr. |
Archives