1 |
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 01:30:00PM +0200, foser wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 21:08 +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > I'm pro-choice, and do not agree with the idea of aggregating USE flags just |
5 |
> > because they sound similar. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> The second time you mention choice. I guess we know what Gentoo is about |
8 |
> by now, the 'choice' argument is too often used just to end criticism. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Choice is an illusion, if you there's too much choice it is no use to |
11 |
> anyone anymore, because nobody really knows what it is all about. This |
12 |
> is already the case with the loads of USE flags/portage options/etc. we |
13 |
> have. Gentoo shouldn't be about choice for the sake of it, it should be |
14 |
> about simplicity/managability : stuff that works. It's a trade-off. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> I wasn't too happy with the introducation of local USE flags for just |
17 |
> the reasons that are becoming a problem now. Too much flags, everybody |
18 |
> adds them at will without good reasons. We used to just say to people |
19 |
> who wanted a specific (rare) set-up that they could easily edit the |
20 |
> ebuild themselves to their need, but nowadays it seems we have to hold |
21 |
> hands all the time and add complexity for nothing. That's good for |
22 |
> nobody really. The installation manual used to be like 5 pages, by now |
23 |
> it's a book of it's own per arch. I don't think that's a good thing and |
24 |
> we should be really, really careful about what we can do to stop this |
25 |
> movement. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> - foser |
28 |
|
29 |
The users seem to be perfectly happy with having a maximum of choice via |
30 |
local USE flags. Most people are also okay with the handbook. So what's |
31 |
the problem, exactly? Should we force everyone to do what _you_ want |
32 |
rather than what _they_ want? |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
Jon Portnoy |
36 |
avenj/irc.freenode.net |
37 |
|
38 |
-- |
39 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |