| 1 |
On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 11:15:58 +0100 |
| 2 |
George Prowse <cokehabit@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> All this is immaterial anyway because even if it had been extensively |
| 4 |
> discussed at length then the proctors would still have acted the |
| 5 |
> same |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
If that really were the case, it would just be an even stronger |
| 8 |
argument for disbanding them. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> or would you have preferred that they held a meeting first and |
| 11 |
> then a focus group and then a coffee morning before trying to stop a |
| 12 |
> thread descending into anarchy? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
The thread descended into anarchy because of the proctors. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> I cant see it would have gone any different to 1) warning. 2) if |
| 17 |
> ignored then act |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Perhaps if the proctors had discussed things first, they wouldn't have |
| 20 |
made two major screwups that resulted in Gentoo losing yet another |
| 21 |
developer. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives