Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Michael Cummings <mcummings@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Bugzilla etiquette suggestions
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:06:03
Message-Id: 1140087765.13568.8.camel@sys947.dtic.mil
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Bugzilla etiquette suggestions by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 02:50 -0700, Duncan wrote:
2
3 >
4 > What I'd do with such bugs is thank the user, but say next time, please
5 > give me a few days, at least a week (or whatever a dev feels comfortable
6 > with for that package, again, it'll vary) -- if it's /just/ a bump
7 > request. If I take over a week (or whatever), then maybe I need
8 > reminding, so let me know! OTOH, if the bug includes "I tried bumping the
9 > last ebuild to use the new sources and it worked fine", or "... and it
10 > broke at <whatever>", that's far more valuable than just a bump request,
11 > and I'd treat it so. (In fact, that sounds like possible AT/HT material,
12 > maybe ultimately leading to a new dev, to me.)
13
14 bingo. a bug for bumping because their edges aren't bloody enough, bah,
15 it'll get done just as soon as i can, but not before then, probably in
16 the next week or so. now a version bump bug because it fixes an actual
17 BUG, ping me, that i'll avoid coffee breaks (actually...that's not a
18 good thing to do...) and sleep to get it in and working. I'm with this
19 Duncan on this one (and someone said the way i couldn't manage in my
20 other drafts :)
21
22 ~mcummings

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature