1 |
On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 02:50 -0700, Duncan wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> |
4 |
> What I'd do with such bugs is thank the user, but say next time, please |
5 |
> give me a few days, at least a week (or whatever a dev feels comfortable |
6 |
> with for that package, again, it'll vary) -- if it's /just/ a bump |
7 |
> request. If I take over a week (or whatever), then maybe I need |
8 |
> reminding, so let me know! OTOH, if the bug includes "I tried bumping the |
9 |
> last ebuild to use the new sources and it worked fine", or "... and it |
10 |
> broke at <whatever>", that's far more valuable than just a bump request, |
11 |
> and I'd treat it so. (In fact, that sounds like possible AT/HT material, |
12 |
> maybe ultimately leading to a new dev, to me.) |
13 |
|
14 |
bingo. a bug for bumping because their edges aren't bloody enough, bah, |
15 |
it'll get done just as soon as i can, but not before then, probably in |
16 |
the next week or so. now a version bump bug because it fixes an actual |
17 |
BUG, ping me, that i'll avoid coffee breaks (actually...that's not a |
18 |
good thing to do...) and sleep to get it in and working. I'm with this |
19 |
Duncan on this one (and someone said the way i couldn't manage in my |
20 |
other drafts :) |
21 |
|
22 |
~mcummings |