1 |
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 02:37:35PM +0000, Peter wrote in |
2 |
<20200721143735.5318.qmail@×××××.se>: |
3 |
>Remco Rijnders wrote: |
4 |
>> - Can the removal of this package from gentoo be pushed backwards with |
5 |
>> a month or so to allow me to work on packaging this new version as well |
6 |
>> as do some rudimentary testing to ensure it works properly with Gentoo? |
7 |
|
8 |
I'm sorry to see this wasn't possible or missed. A bit later than |
9 |
expected, I have just submitted a PR to add this package back in, see |
10 |
https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/17239 . I hope it can go in |
11 |
shortly, but as this is my first PR to Gentoo, I also hope it is of |
12 |
sufficient quality. Please be gentle ;-) |
13 |
|
14 |
>> - As upstream for this program would be changed, should the name |
15 |
>> getmail in gentoo be kept or would it better to use getmail6, and if |
16 |
>> so, what would be the best way to go about this? |
17 |
> |
18 |
>Since you want to avoid clobbering the existing name outside of Gentoo |
19 |
>I think you should strive for the same also within Gentoo. That said, |
20 |
>if the two are interchangeable then a virtual/getmail ebuild would |
21 |
>probably be reasonable. |
22 |
|
23 |
I have left it at the original name seeing how the old version has now |
24 |
been removed from Gentoo and this new version is (read: should be) |
25 |
drop in compatible. I'll happily change this if the consensus is that |
26 |
this would be better. |
27 |
|
28 |
Thanks! |
29 |
|
30 |
Remco |