1 |
On 12/8/05, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò <flameeyes@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> Another package is taking a long long way that goes out of portage. |
3 |
> I'm running out of openings for these mails, you know? |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Oh well, media-video/dvdrip has many issues reported in bugzilla (some have |
6 |
> patches, most haven't), and depends on a version of transcode with many |
7 |
> issues, too (and force us to leave transcode 1 masked). |
8 |
|
9 |
Last time i tried, dvdrip worked with transcode 1 (at least the |
10 |
unstable version of dvdrip), |
11 |
furthermore there are only 9 bugs against the package: |
12 |
- 2 are version bumps request |
13 |
- if you remove the version bump and a dependency fix, there are no |
14 |
bugs against the latest version (in ~arch) |
15 |
|
16 |
Moreover the package is still maintained upstream (last release 30 |
17 |
october 2005). |
18 |
|
19 |
So please consider keeping dvdrip in portage. |
20 |
|
21 |
> Nobody in video herd is looking at it right now, last bump was done by morfic, |
22 |
> and more would be needed. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Alternative dvd-ripping software is present in portage, starting from mencoder |
25 |
> and its frontends, and they usually works better (look at winki for example). |
26 |
> |
27 |
AFAIK there are no other frontend to dvdrip. |
28 |
|
29 |
thanks, |
30 |
|
31 |
Benoit Boissinot |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |