| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o>: |
| 4 |
> On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 14:52:11 +0100 |
| 5 |
> Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > Please be so kind and use full package atoms in the bug description |
| 7 |
> > line (especially when bug wrangling), searching is made easier that |
| 8 |
> > way. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> "Bug reports that refer to a single or a few (similar) packages |
| 11 |
> should detail the package atom(s) as completely as possible in the |
| 12 |
> Summary, including a version only when other versions do not exhibit |
| 13 |
> the bug."[1] |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I know that piece, I wrote the initial version of that paragraph. :) |
| 16 |
But some people who are allowed to assign directly (mostly developers) |
| 17 |
tend to forget it. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
V-Li |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project |
| 23 |
<URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
<URL:http://www.faulhammer.org/> |
Archives