| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh a écrit : |
| 2 |
> * Hard dep upon boost. This sucks for g++-4.1 users. |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> * Hard dep upon g++-4.1, which isn't available for all archs. This |
| 5 |
> doesn't even work because there's no guarantee that >=4.1 is being used |
| 6 |
> even if it's installed. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> * || ( ) deps, and hope that if the user has 4.1 installed then they're |
| 9 |
> using it. Since library implementations aren't runtime switchable, this |
| 10 |
> will lead to breakages if users upgrade gcc and then remove boost. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> None of these are particularly nice... |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Newbie idea : g++ and boost both provide virtual/tr1 |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Newbie question : besides the fact that you would have to rebuild |
| 18 |
packages if you changed the virtual, is there anything painfully obvious |
| 19 |
why that would be a bad idea ? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Just a thought :) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Rémi |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives