| 1 |
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 14/09/14 17:30, Patrick Lauer wrote: |
| 3 |
>>> Are we going to disallow merge commits and ask devs to rebase local |
| 4 |
>>> changes in order to keep the history "clean"? |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> Is that going to be sane with our commit frequency? |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Which is our commit frequency? Worst case we can aggregate changes and |
| 10 |
> push them in bulk. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I don't think commit frequency will be a problem other than maybe |
| 14 |
causing repoman issues if you're doing tree-wide changes (since |
| 15 |
repoman takes a while to run). |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
See: |
| 18 |
https://github.com/rich0/gentoo-gitmig-2014-09-15/graphs/commit-activity |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Our tree gets 50-150 commits/day on average it seems. I have no idea |
| 21 |
how far back the punchcard view goes, but that should give a relative |
| 22 |
sense of distribution. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Rich |
Archives