Archives
Archives
| From: | Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] RESTRICT=parallel for builds that can't be executed in parallel | ||
| Date: | Wed, 14 Apr 2010 23:34:33 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20100414173617.5b1d0f3f@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] RESTRICT=parallel for builds that can't be executed in parallel by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> | ||
| 1 | On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:03:10 +0000 (UTC) |
| 2 | Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > BTW, gcc seems to do some stage output comparing in its bootstrap |
| 5 | > process. Is that all absolute code correctness, or is there some |
| 6 | > performance benchmarking there that could benefit from this as well? |
| 7 | |
| 8 | It's all code correctness. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | fonts, by design, by neglect |
| 13 | gcc-porting, for a fact or just for effect |
| 14 | wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |