Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Matthew Thode <prometheanfire@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] adding app-crypt/gentoo-keys to @system
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 04:21:24
Message-Id: 20190220042115.tuj6arxd747ggzv3@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] adding app-crypt/gentoo-keys to @system by Michael Orlitzky
1 On 19-02-19 23:04:26, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
2 > On 2/19/19 10:23 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
3 > > As the title says, I think this should be done.
4 > >
5 > > First sync is impossible to verify without keys (webrsync)
6 > > app-crypt/gentoo-keys has no dependencies, which help avoid some bloat
7 > > in the base install.
8 > >
9 > > Let the bikeshedding begin.
10 > >
11 >
12 > I don't have app-crypt/gentoo-keys installed. I seem to be doing okay
13 > without it.
14 >
15 > In any case, on principle, we shouldn't add anything else to @system. No
16 > one agrees on how we should treat @system packages as far as
17 > dependencies go, and the whole idea is a stinky pile of dirty laundry
18 > that we should work to make explicit instead.
19 >
20 > What problem would this solve? (Is adding gentoo-keys to @system the
21 > least bad way to solve it?)
22 >
23
24 It'd allow the stage tarballs (3,4) to use webrsync-gpg to verify
25 portage tarballs. This is useful for the initial sync (as called out in
26 our manual). Otherwise using emerge-webrsync could be mitm'd or
27 otherwise messed with.
28
29 As far how we treat deps of @system packages, since this does not have
30 any deps that should help check that box for anyone worried.
31
32 --
33 Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] adding app-crypt/gentoo-keys to @system Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o>