| 1 |
On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 1:01 PM Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Part of my frustration is that seemingly "anything open source related |
| 5 |
> can be held in Gentoo" and I'm somewhat against that as I feel it |
| 6 |
> dilutes the Gentoo mission. We are here to make a distribution, not |
| 7 |
> maintain random libraries. If you want to do that feel free; but I |
| 8 |
> don't see a need for that work to be associated with Gentoo. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Honestly, other than maybe some prestige I don't really get the point |
| 12 |
of hosting random software in Gentoo either. These days getting a |
| 13 |
repo on github or any of its 47 competitors is a few clicks. You have |
| 14 |
zero overhead from a governance standpoint, and a dev can of course |
| 15 |
stick ebuilds in the main repository with zero interference. It seems |
| 16 |
a lot cleaner from a copyright/etc standpoint as well. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Even openrc is hosted outside of Gentoo these days, which makes perfect sense. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
With the distro as a whole it is a bit more complex, though honestly |
| 21 |
I'd love to see us get to a point where the whole thing can be |
| 22 |
SECURELY hosted entirely off-infra as well, even if we still chose to |
| 23 |
run our own infra. I just see it as a way to both provide options to |
| 24 |
our users and ourselves. For the latter, being able to host anything |
| 25 |
on an outside service means that if some component of infra goes down |
| 26 |
we could have mirrors already running and pulling from infra, or if |
| 27 |
for some reason somebody sues us or roots us or whatever we can pick |
| 28 |
up and move without much fuss. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Running your own wiki/bugzilla/lists/etc was about the only way to do |
| 31 |
things in the 90s/etc, but these days there are other options... |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Rich |
Archives