| 1 |
On 12/4/19 7:26 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 2019-12-04 at 17:24 +0200, Joonas Niilola wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 12/4/19 5:21 PM, Kent Fredric wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On Wed, 04 Dec 2019 13:36:07 +0100 |
| 5 |
>>> Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
>>> |
| 7 |
>>>> My point is: gentoo.org as a HOMEPAGE sucks. Please use something more |
| 8 |
>>>> specific instead. Even link to gitweb would be more helpful because it |
| 9 |
>>>> would at least be relevant to the package in question. |
| 10 |
>>> I agree so much I would support the addition of a QA check for this. |
| 11 |
>>> |
| 12 |
>> I take it you haven't checked the CI results lately? Reaction to that |
| 13 |
>> probably spawned this ML thread. |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/output.html |
| 16 |
> Actually, I've requested that check. However, I didn't expect that many |
| 17 |
> packages to be affected. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Given that it's open season on me lately, and apparently people feel |
| 20 |
> offended when bugs are reported for their packages, I've decided to |
| 21 |
> start by trying to make people realize the problem globally first. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
That's a nice initiatitve. Overall I feel like (global) future CI checks |
| 24 |
should be discussed first, because they affect everyone who's |
| 25 |
committing, and it feels weird starting to suddenly receive mails about |
| 26 |
things you've pushed a hundred times before. As seen by the evergrowing |
| 27 |
list of new warnings, people just start to ignore these new checks or |
| 28 |
"fix it on next version bump", because knowledge wasn't there on a |
| 29 |
previous one. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- juippis |
Archives