| 1 |
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina |
| 2 |
<zerochaos@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I see exactly zero downside to doing this, so if whoever is going to |
| 5 |
> actually do the editing of the profiles would like to work with me (to |
| 6 |
> give me warning), I think I can manage the rest. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I see no harm in this - it is just a tarball on a website somewhere |
| 9 |
and a news item. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I suggest you draft your news item so that it is bikeshed with time to |
| 12 |
spare, then you can just substitute your intended URL inside at the |
| 13 |
last minute, and then take the snapshot. I don't think you need to |
| 14 |
worry about getting it down to the commit - just grab a snapshot |
| 15 |
reasonably close to the profile change. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Actually, I can't really think of a practical reason not to just do |
| 18 |
the news/snapshot now. Nobody will see the news until they do an |
| 19 |
emerge --sync, and if they do an emerge --sync a year from now it |
| 20 |
makes little difference that the snapshot is an extra two weeks out of |
| 21 |
date or whatever. Then there is nothing to coordinate. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Rich |
Archives