Archives
Archives
| From: | Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [GSoC2012] Cross Container Support Project | ||
| Date: | Fri, 23 Mar 2012 11:16:49 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20120323111604.GC25077@localhost | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [GSoC2012] Cross Container Support Project by Alexey Shvetsov |
||
| 1 | On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 01:46:17PM +0300, Alexey Shvetsov wrote: |
| 2 | > Hi! |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > Well i have 2 arm lxc containers on amd64 machine. Its works good if |
| 5 | > qemu support most of needed cross arch instructions |
| 6 | |
| 7 | I'd be curious how much of that is native, vs emulated. The hybrid |
| 8 | approach of scratchbox/obs has some definite gains. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | If we had a clean way to mark which can be native (toolchain), the |
| 11 | perf gain is definitely worth the work... |
| 12 | |
| 13 | ~brian |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [GSoC2012] Cross Container Support Project | Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> |