1 |
I have already writting some basic description about the behaviour of |
2 |
multilib-portage, which can be seen here: |
3 |
|
4 |
> http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_1d97fc4c50a6373efe97fcc7f18c5f41.xml |
5 |
|
6 |
Now ciaranm requested a formal spec for this, as written on the |
7 |
gentoo-project ML: |
8 |
|
9 |
> Ciaran McCreesh schrieb: |
10 |
> Really, I'd like a diff against PMS, or at least enough that someone |
11 |
> could implement it independently without inspecting the Portage code. |
12 |
> It's very hard to discuss something without detailed specifics. |
13 |
> |
14 |
|
15 |
Since i am not familiar with this sort of writing, i am searching for |
16 |
some people, who could prepare something like that. |
17 |
If anyone is interested, please contact me off-list. The above link |
18 |
should have the basic content but for such a requested spec, there are |
19 |
probably some more details needed (e.g. default wrapping of binaries is |
20 |
now also implemented). |
21 |
|
22 |
Thanks in advance to anyone helping with this. |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
|
26 |
Thomas Sachau |
27 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |