1 |
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 15:37:17 +0200 |
2 |
Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Dnia 13 września 2015 11:48:54 CEST, Jason Zaman |
5 |
> <perfinion@g.o> napisał(a): |
6 |
> >On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 09:12:25PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
7 |
> >> Potential solution: bi-dir github <=> bugzilla integration |
8 |
> >> ========================================================== |
9 |
> >> |
10 |
> >> My current idea would be pretty much that: |
11 |
> >> |
12 |
> >> 1. a new dedicated Gentoo bug would be automatically created for |
13 |
> >every |
14 |
> >> pull request on github, |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> >Will this be only github PR's? will github issues be mirrored too? or |
17 |
> >are the issues not supposed to be used on github at all? |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Issues are already disabled and I don't see any point in enabling |
20 |
> them. |
21 |
> |
22 |
|
23 |
I've been doing github api work in my new job. Pull-requests ARE |
24 |
issues, just a special version of an issue is all. Your suppose to be |
25 |
able to call up the pull request number using the same number in an |
26 |
issue call. |
27 |
|
28 |
Do you mean the issue tracker is disabled? Then they are only allowing |
29 |
pull request issues, not general issues. |
30 |
|
31 |
> > |
32 |
> >Also, I think the new bugzie version allows multiple aliases on a |
33 |
> >bug, so can we automomatically assign them github-pr-123 and |
34 |
> >github-issue-234 |
35 |
> >etc? |
36 |
> |
37 |
> Sounds good. |
38 |
> |
39 |
> > |
40 |
> >> What are your thoughts? Any other proposals? |
41 |
> > |
42 |
> >Overall I like the idea. I think the quoting and other issues can be |
43 |
> >fixed in an acceptable way. |
44 |
> > |
45 |
> >-- Jason |
46 |
> |
47 |
> |
48 |
|
49 |
|
50 |
|
51 |
-- |
52 |
Brian Dolbec <dolsen> |