From: | Jonas Stein <jstein@g.o> |
---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> |
Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: media-video/rovclock |
Date: | Sun, 29 Oct 2017 14:28:17 |
Message-Id: | 366e3c3e-29e1-d2d4-a5fe-14a4ce2d41b5@gentoo.org |
1 | Dear all, |
2 | |
3 | The following packages are up for grabs: |
4 | |
5 | media-video/rovclock |
6 | |
7 | after retirement of the proxied maintainer. |
8 | (https://bugs.gentoo.org/632896 was also upstream) |
9 | |
10 | https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/media-video/rovclock |
11 | |
12 | |
13 | The primary question is, if it is worth to keep it in the tree: |
14 | The ebuild provides |
15 | "Overclocking utility for ATI Radeon cards" |
16 | which were produced till ~2005, |
17 | |
18 | Cards reported to work: |
19 | |
20 | Radeon 7500 |
21 | Radeon 8500 |
22 | Radeon 9000 |
23 | Radeon 9100 |
24 | Radeon 9500 (Pro) |
25 | Radeon 9550 |
26 | Radeon 9600 |
27 | Mobility FireGL T2 |
28 | Mobility Radeon 9600 M10 |
29 | Radeon 9700 (Pro) |
30 | Radeon X800XL |
31 | |
32 | the upstream project is dead since January 2006. |
33 | http://www.hasw.net/linux/index.html |
34 | |
35 | If we want to keep this in the tree, it would be great, if a new |
36 | maintainer would simply stabilize |
37 | rovclock-0.6e-r1.ebuild |
38 | which is already EAPI=6 |
39 | and delete the obsolete |
40 | rovclock-0.6e.ebuild |
41 | |
42 | -- |
43 | Best, |
44 | Jonas |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |