| 1 |
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 5:40 PM, James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
>>>>>> "RF" == Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> writes: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> RF> Is this package working in the typical case? That is, when you aren't |
| 5 |
> RF> intentionally trying to buffer-overflow it or otherwise break it? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I haven't found an image file which causes it to crash. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Seems like a compelling case to keep it around - works for me as well. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I'm taking over maintainership. I'll leave it masked until the buffer |
| 12 |
overflows are cleaned up (with an appropriate mask comment so users |
| 13 |
can make an informed decision about using it). The package will not |
| 14 |
be removed in 30 days, however. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Rich |
Archives