1 |
Jan Kundrát wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> "What is most interesting to me about this discussion is the fact than |
4 |
> no one has bothered to offer any facts to back up these assertions." -- |
5 |
> author should read any of the wolf31o2's mails about this subject. |
6 |
|
7 |
I _have_ read his "mails" about it, had several exchanges with him on the |
8 |
topic myself. As a matter of fact if you read the "FUD" you might note |
9 |
some of his quotes are the reasons I ran the tests in the first place. |
10 |
Frankly, I believe he is wrong, and I explained why. |
11 |
|
12 |
The FUD is that stage3 is a better installation process than a (corrected) |
13 |
stage1. The facts are right there in what I posted. Stage3's take twice |
14 |
as long rebuilding the same number of packages and introduce a plethora of |
15 |
roadblocks in the build process unless you stay on a very narrow path. How |
16 |
any "developer" can claim that this is a quicker, cleaner, or easier |
17 |
process to support is beyond me. Maybe in bizarro world. |
18 |
|
19 |
I will stick to the facts myself, thank you very much. I invite you to |
20 |
actually read the reports I generated and tell where my conclusions are |
21 |
wrong. If you can't do that, you are fudding yourself. |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |