| 1 |
"keyring" conveys the appropriate meaning, imho. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Sat, Dec 25, 2021, 5:19 AM Marek Szuba <marecki@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> On 24 December 2021 08:48:08 UTC, Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> >> > I think “secret” may be too generic and “libsecret” is not ideal in |
| 10 |
> case |
| 11 |
> >> > an implemention comes along that is named differently. How about |
| 12 |
> >> > “secret-service”? |
| 13 |
> >> |
| 14 |
> >> I think this is a good idea. |
| 15 |
> >> |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> >And "keyring"? I am not sure if users not familiar with "libsecret" will |
| 18 |
> >understand what "secret*" means in this context |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Definitely a good idea. And I second "keyring", seeing as this term is |
| 21 |
> also in use on other OSes. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> -- |
| 24 |
> Marecki |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> |
Archives