Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Daniel Goller <morfic@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo: State of the Union
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 13:44:07
Message-Id: 44536D0B.6010402@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo: State of the Union by Ryan Phillips
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4
5 >
6 > What is interesting is that Source Mage Linux has already voted on a proposal
7 > similar to mine[2]. I truly think that making some changes in the "gentoo way"
8 > would benefit us and make gentoo a truly better distribution.
9 >
10 > Ryan
11 > Gentoo Developer
12 >
13 > [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/37599
14 > [2] http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/2006-April/014069.html
15
16 I would really like to hear more on [2], get something like it going,
17 then we could all vote on the scm of choice this thread has succumb to.
18 Although switching away from cvs is one of the many topics of this mail
19 (and if you want a foundation for some of the others), it is not the
20 only one. I would like to hear more on changing how we vote (unless you
21 all really like how voting is done now, be it problem resolution or
22 technical innovation), more on developer growth (we should be an open
23 inviting community) and why you think stricter test make for better
24 developers, why you think harder tests would cut down more on the quick
25 in and out people.
26 I don't just mean to hear the "hells no"s also the "hells yeah"s,
27 especially those that are just reading and then thinking it.
28
29
30 Daniel
31 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
32 Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
33 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
34
35 iD8DBQFEU20L/aM9DdBw91cRAkPxAKCNB10kVHzVF+okuTc7Pc1Ysuza5QCcCdZ8
36 cYBVs1j9tBce2wTlCF7x7Tg=
37 =WWf3
38 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
39 --
40 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo: State of the Union Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o>