1 |
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: |
2 |
> > Can you try swapping the two in the virtual? |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Or not. |
5 |
|
6 |
I guess that you assumed that I suggested to test this in-tree, so |
7 |
I guess I should clarify that I would expect it to be tested in |
8 |
PORTDIR_OVERLAY. |
9 |
|
10 |
If my guess is correct then you are really way too eager to |
11 |
misunderstand what people intend to transmit, given a less than |
12 |
unambiguous message. |
13 |
|
14 |
In the future, please give me (and why not others) the benefit of the |
15 |
doubt, and ask for clarification if I suggest something that seems |
16 |
like a bad idea to you. |
17 |
|
18 |
It does require more email round trips, but the end result is not |
19 |
only a positive discussion which promotes greater understanding for |
20 |
active and passive participants alike - it also makes you seem much |
21 |
more sympathetic which can only be a good thing. |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
//Peter |