Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.16 moving to ~arch

[Diego Elio Pettenò]

On 19/08/2012 20:07, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> gnutls is not valid and i will not wait for it.  boost i'll give the
> maintainer time to resolve as the patch to boost-1.49 can be made to work, but
> it's not that great, and there are already plans on moving boost-1.50 to
> unstable which is all i need.

The same applies to GnuTLS 3, you know ­— would be nice if you fixed the
games, and the other packages you maintain, that break with it.

For reference these are the other two trackers:

http://bugs.gentoo.org/alias/gnutls-3
http://bugs.gentoo.org/alias/boost-1.50

FWIW GnuTLS 3.1 is perfectly fine to go into ~arch IMHO as I've been
using it for a while and most of the bugs are only present on gnutls USE
flag turned on (and not for all SSL support).

-- 
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flameeyes@×××××××××.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/