1 |
begin quote |
2 |
On 02 Jun 2002 22:41:52 +0200 |
3 |
Martin Schlemmer <azarah@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
|
5 |
> On Sat, 2002-06-01 at 15:18, Spider wrote: |
6 |
> > well, |
7 |
> > as the moment of release prances forward I'm looking at the current |
8 |
> > state of ebuilds. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > right now we libtoolize a lot of gnome 2 except the core parts |
11 |
> > that is glib atk gtk+ and pango, simply because they break with |
12 |
> > libtoolize... fun isn't it? |
13 |
|
14 |
> Now what I propose, is that if we do not libtoolize Gnome2, |
15 |
> then we should at least write an eclass that patches all |
16 |
> "ltmain.sh" 's with the relink patch, and with our own |
17 |
> libtool-portage patch. |
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
Now this could certainly be doable since we are already eclassifying |
21 |
gnome2 components (in the progress right now) and we hope to finish this |
22 |
in due time for most of the gnome2 desktop release. |
23 |
|
24 |
right now some stuff break because of libtoolization, others work, |
25 |
but... why and how is a different measure for me, but we'll go as is |
26 |
current. they libtoolize and it works. |
27 |
|
28 |
//Spider |
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
begin .signature |
35 |
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! |
36 |
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. |
37 |
end |