Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Spider <spider@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Cc: azarah@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gnome2 libtoolization
Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2002 17:18:27
Message-Id: 20020603001754.27e15936.spider@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gnome2 libtoolization by Martin Schlemmer
1 begin quote
2 On 02 Jun 2002 22:41:52 +0200
3 Martin Schlemmer <azarah@g.o> wrote:
4
5 > On Sat, 2002-06-01 at 15:18, Spider wrote:
6 > > well,
7 > > as the moment of release prances forward I'm looking at the current
8 > > state of ebuilds.
9 > >
10 > > right now we libtoolize a lot of gnome 2 except the core parts
11 > > that is glib atk gtk+ and pango, simply because they break with
12 > > libtoolize... fun isn't it?
13
14 > Now what I propose, is that if we do not libtoolize Gnome2,
15 > then we should at least write an eclass that patches all
16 > "ltmain.sh" 's with the relink patch, and with our own
17 > libtool-portage patch.
18
19
20 Now this could certainly be doable since we are already eclassifying
21 gnome2 components (in the progress right now) and we hope to finish this
22 in due time for most of the gnome2 desktop release.
23
24 right now some stuff break because of libtoolization, others work,
25 but... why and how is a different measure for me, but we'll go as is
26 current. they libtoolize and it works.
27
28 //Spider
29
30
31
32
33 --
34 begin .signature
35 This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
36 See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
37 end