| 1 |
13.10.2016 16:53, Ulrich Mueller пишет: |
| 2 |
> Hi all, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I suggest that we ban the dolib and libopts commands in EAPI 7. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Rationale: |
| 7 |
> 1. There are about 60 instances of dolib in the tree. At least one |
| 8 |
> third of them appears to be wrong (e.g., should be replaced by |
| 9 |
> dolib.so for correct mode). |
| 10 |
> 2. libopts affects only dolib, while the more special commands dolib.a |
| 11 |
> and dolib.so install libraries with fixed modes 0644 and 0755, |
| 12 |
> respectively. (The latter is also consistent with dobin installing |
| 13 |
> with fixed mode 0755, i.e., there is no binopts command.) |
| 14 |
> 3. There is no newlib command corresponding to dolib, whereas |
| 15 |
> newlib.{a,so} commands exist. |
| 16 |
> 4. libopts is not used at all in the tree, which strongly indicates |
| 17 |
> that there is no need for it. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Replacement: |
| 20 |
> Use dolib.a or dolib.so instead. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Comments? |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Ulrich |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Fine by me. I can not remember right now if i ever used dolib instead of |
| 28 |
dolib.so or dolib.a(probably i did), but i do not see any caveats in |
| 29 |
your arguments. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Best regards, Sergey Popov |
| 33 |
Gentoo developer |
| 34 |
Gentoo Desktop-effects project lead |
| 35 |
Gentoo Quality Assurance project lead |
Archives