| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Richard Freeman wrote: |
| 5 |
> Steven J Long wrote: |
| 6 |
>> Getting into a nonsensical debate about PN being metadata seems to be |
| 7 |
>> the level of the argument, so forgive me for not being very impressed. |
| 8 |
>> (It's externally derived and in fact the whole point of the product; |
| 9 |
>> unless someone is proposing losing PN and PV from filename, can we |
| 10 |
>> *please* dismiss that argument as the irrelevance which it is?) |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Without actually intending to open a new debate on that issue <cringes>, |
| 14 |
> I'm actually a fan of NOT obtaining PN and PV from the filename. I've |
| 15 |
> seen an approach like this used in various systems and I happen to like it: |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
In which systems did you see this approach? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Marijn |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
- -- |
| 23 |
If you cannot read my mind, then listen to what I say. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gentoo ML |
| 26 |
<http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-{lisp,ml} on FreeNode |
| 27 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 28 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) |
| 29 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
iEYEARECAAYFAkomU8YACgkQp/VmCx0OL2ym0QCfcbruFkqtUIBhdwhKIjaP9qol |
| 32 |
Qi8An0TdECGv14pgMTmjdDhllvGylM7y |
| 33 |
=1iV1 |
| 34 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives