1 |
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:00:49 -0800 Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> |
2 |
wrote: |
3 |
| On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 11:38:04PM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
4 |
| > On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:32:03 -0800 Brian Harring |
5 |
| > <ferringb@×××××.com> wrote: |
6 |
| > | You're ignoring that new style virtuals can have versions; thus |
7 |
| > | virtual/tr-[arbitrary version <1] |
8 |
| > | can be 'almost full 1 support'. |
9 |
| > |
10 |
| > Which means what, in terms of parts of tr1 that are and aren't |
11 |
| > supplied by various people? There's no nice neat linear progression |
12 |
| > there, beyond most things requiring a few of the new basic |
13 |
| > utilities. |
14 |
| |
15 |
| The linear progression would be made up as you go- admittedly, if a |
16 |
| third provider shows up, scheme goes to hell. |
17 |
|
18 |
A third provider like STLport or icc? STLport already supports tr1 hash |
19 |
tables... |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
23 |
Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org |
24 |
Web : http://ciaranm.org/ |
25 |
Paludis, the secure package manager : http://paludis.pioto.org/ |