| 1 |
On Sunday 14 April 2013 07:26:26 Peter Stuge wrote: |
| 2 |
> Michał Górny wrote: |
| 3 |
> > > > Any thoughts? |
| 4 |
> > > |
| 5 |
> > > If doing this at all I think it should take an -r option to enable |
| 6 |
> > > the new recursion, for symmetry with the do* functions and for |
| 7 |
> > > backwards compatibility. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > Backwards compatibility with what? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> With the old non-recursive behavior of edos2unix that could only |
| 12 |
> operate on a single file. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Arguably, all old users *should* have refered to single files, but I |
| 15 |
> would still prefer adding a -r just to be sure to avoid collateral |
| 16 |
> damage. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
if you run the current edos2unix on a dir, it'll fail. so i don't think |
| 19 |
backwards compat is a big worry here. |
| 20 |
-mike |
Archives