1 |
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 15:52 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:39:26 -0400 "Nathan L. Adams" <nadams@××××.org> |
3 |
> wrote: |
4 |
> | Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
5 |
> | > I've been going through the EBUILD list at random and providing |
6 |
> | > lists of things that need to be fixed before the ebuild can be |
7 |
> | > considered for inclusion. The WONTFIX resolution along with a |
8 |
> | > comment asking for the submitter to reopen with a fixed ebuild is |
9 |
> | > used when problems are found. |
10 |
> | |
11 |
> | If you have time, could you please review the ebuild attached to this |
12 |
> | bug: |
13 |
> | |
14 |
> | http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94764 |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Will do. There's rather a large list (assigned to maintainer-wanted and |
17 |
> ebuild in keywords and not verified in keywords gives 600ish), but I'll |
18 |
> get to it whenever the random number god decrees it :) |
19 |
|
20 |
*sigh* |
21 |
|
22 |
Please stay away from that bug. It is assigned to the games team, as it |
23 |
is a games bug, and it will be gotten to when we have the time and not |
24 |
before. Nathan is once again using a discussion to fuel his own |
25 |
personal desires and attempting to circumvent the games team. We peer |
26 |
review our own ebuilds against each other, so there's no need to have |
27 |
other developers do so, unless you're wanting to join the games team... |
28 |
=] |
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
Chris Gianelloni |
32 |
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager |
33 |
Games - Developer |
34 |
Gentoo Linux |