| 1 |
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:31 AM, Sergey Popov <pinkbyte@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> So, i like your idea to stick stable to the LTS kernel. While it can |
| 3 |
> lead to potential problems with some external modules(which are, for |
| 4 |
> example, marked stable now but does not support 3.4 kernel) the majority |
| 5 |
> of really stable external kernel modules usually backward compatible |
| 6 |
> with LTS kernels. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
By LTS I was thinking more of 3.14, and not so much 3.4 or (gasp) |
| 9 |
2.6.32. We just want to get out of the version of the month grind. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
-- |
| 12 |
Rich |
Archives