| 1 |
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 03/24/2013 09:40 PM, Peter Stuge wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> The masks are sort of announcements as you have 30 days to revert that |
| 5 |
>>> decision. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> You don't seem to recognize the quite significant psychological |
| 8 |
>> impact of you having already made the decision, compared to, say, |
| 9 |
>> having an actually inclusive package removal process. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> If the package has been "rotting away" with open bugs in bugzilla for |
| 12 |
> weeks or months and no one cares ... what are we supposed to do? Wait a |
| 13 |
> bit longer? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I suspect the concern is over the definition of "rotting away." Just |
| 16 |
about every package in the tree has had open bugs for weeks and |
| 17 |
months. Not all bugs are worth fixing right away, but that doesn't |
| 18 |
mean they aren't valid. When they can be fixed, they are. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Packages without bugs are packages that nobody has bothered to test... :) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Rich |
Archives