| 1 |
On 4/17/07, Bryan Østergaard <kloeri@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> And just to be even more clear about this - his bad behaviour isn't only |
| 3 |
> about language but also about his actions on bugzilla such as |
| 4 |
> reassigning bugs without trying to contact maintainers first, |
| 5 |
> reassigning bugs against the maintainers explicit wishes etc. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Err, you know very well that devrel has been CCed on the last email |
| 8 |
exchange w/ peitolm (about ~6 weeks ago)... which, oh what a surprise, |
| 9 |
hasn't gone anywhere yet again, and the same exact 2 year old bugs |
| 10 |
have been carried on into yet another ebuild version. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
But as stated in my original resignation, slacking developers feeling |
| 13 |
uncomfortable and their wishes to keep ignoring their bugs for another |
| 14 |
couple of years being shamelessly disrespected are far more important |
| 15 |
for Gentoo than the actual long-lasting breakage for users and clearly |
| 16 |
noone should care too much about people who just happen to have |
| 17 |
getting the bugs fixed in a timely manner a part of their job |
| 18 |
description. Bug wranglers are in fact dumb assign/CC scripts who |
| 19 |
definitely shouldn't care for the bugs once they've been assigned. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> holding developers to higher |
| 22 |
> standards is completely in line with the council wishes I believe. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Indeed. I've noticed the high standards being pushed by devrel quite a |
| 25 |
couple of times, such as in [1]. So Bret, I sincerely hope you'll get |
| 26 |
your devbox finally running after 3 years or so and you'll continue to |
| 27 |
be such a great assett to Gentoo as you've been so far. ;) |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38368 |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Best regards, |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Jakub Moc |
| 36 |
Email: jakub.moc@×××××.com |
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives