1 |
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 10:45 AM Kent Fredric <kentnl@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 10:27:01 -0400 |
4 |
> Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> > If you want to define behavior that can be relied upon in ebuilds, it |
7 |
> > should be specified in PMS. PMS does not define any meaning for the |
8 |
> > "test" USE flag. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> We should eschew idealism about how the world *should* behave, and avoid |
11 |
> making portage a steaming garbage heap in order to comply with a |
12 |
> terrible PMS specification of a heavily used feature. |
13 |
|
14 |
Portage still works just fine for most people who would enable |
15 |
FEATURES=test. Stop exaggerating. |