1 |
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 08:49:31AM +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
2 |
> On Monday 31 July 2006 14:53, Bryan Ãstergaard wrote: |
3 |
> > On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 01:01:20PM +0200, Christian Andreetta wrote: |
4 |
> > > Many users (and I'm both a dev *and* a user) just could do much for |
5 |
> > > Gentoo, but when you're interested in a niche sector package, you *don't |
6 |
> > > have other choices* but |
7 |
> > > |
8 |
> > > 1) an endless wait for an open bug |
9 |
> > > 2) becoming dev for the good of all :-) |
10 |
> > > 3) just use your personal overlay, without sharing the results of your |
11 |
> > > efforts. If the bug in 1) is still open, why updating it with your |
12 |
> > > latest patches/revision bumps? |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > 4) Bash devs to add your ebuild |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Which one exactly. The point is that it is not on a dev's turf. |
17 |
> |
18 |
Many ebuilds sitting in bugzie naturally falls under one herd or |
19 |
another. And if you can't find any developer that should (likely) be |
20 |
maintaining the ebuild you can always ask in the irc channels geared |
21 |
towards users (#gentoo-bugs, #gentoo-dev-help, even #gentoo) or ask on |
22 |
gentoo-dev ML. Lots of ways to get developers attentions imo. |
23 |
|
24 |
Regards, |
25 |
Bryan Østergaard |
26 |
-- |
27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |