Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Bryan Ãstergaard" <kloeri@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Resignation
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 08:10:52
Message-Id: 20060803080722.GD4021@woodpecker.gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Resignation by Paul de Vrieze
1 On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 08:49:31AM +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
2 > On Monday 31 July 2006 14:53, Bryan Ãstergaard wrote:
3 > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 01:01:20PM +0200, Christian Andreetta wrote:
4 > > > Many users (and I'm both a dev *and* a user) just could do much for
5 > > > Gentoo, but when you're interested in a niche sector package, you *don't
6 > > > have other choices* but
7 > > >
8 > > > 1) an endless wait for an open bug
9 > > > 2) becoming dev for the good of all :-)
10 > > > 3) just use your personal overlay, without sharing the results of your
11 > > > efforts. If the bug in 1) is still open, why updating it with your
12 > > > latest patches/revision bumps?
13 > >
14 > > 4) Bash devs to add your ebuild
15 >
16 > Which one exactly. The point is that it is not on a dev's turf.
17 >
18 Many ebuilds sitting in bugzie naturally falls under one herd or
19 another. And if you can't find any developer that should (likely) be
20 maintaining the ebuild you can always ask in the irc channels geared
21 towards users (#gentoo-bugs, #gentoo-dev-help, even #gentoo) or ask on
22 gentoo-dev ML. Lots of ways to get developers attentions imo.
23
24 Regards,
25 Bryan Østergaard
26 --
27 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list