| 1 |
On Monday 06 August 2001 09:07, you wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Monday 06 August 2001 08:18, you wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Monday 06 August 2001 00:22, you wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > On Sun, 5 Aug 2001 15:22:06 -0600 Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o> |
| 5 |
> > > |
| 6 |
> > > wrote: |
| 7 |
> > > > On Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 03:22:51PM +0000, Collins Richey wrote: |
| 8 |
> > > > > The source in /usr/tmp/portage/sylpheed-0.5.2/work/sylpheed-0.5.2 |
| 9 |
> > > > |
| 10 |
> > > > looks |
| 11 |
> > > > |
| 12 |
> > > > > normal, and there is a configure file. |
| 13 |
> > > > > |
| 14 |
> > > > > Any clues? |
| 15 |
> > > > |
| 16 |
> > > > Yes; the S= setting has a trailing period. |
| 17 |
> > > > |
| 18 |
> > > > -- |
| 19 |
> > > |
| 20 |
> > > Thanks. |
| 21 |
> > > |
| 22 |
> > > The only delta required from sylpheed-0.5.0.ebuild to ...0.5.2.... are |
| 23 |
> > > the following lines. |
| 24 |
> > > |
| 25 |
> > > A=${PN}-0.5.2.tar.bz2 |
| 26 |
> > > S=${WORKDIR}/${PN}-0.5.2 |
| 27 |
> > > |
| 28 |
> > > I am using gentoo_rc5 with portage 1.5.2 and a default /etc/make.conf. |
| 29 |
> > > Someone might want to look and see if it builds with other use and/or |
| 30 |
> > > cpu options, although I doubt any problems - I've never had any |
| 31 |
> > > problems with sylpheed incremental releases. |
| 32 |
> > |
| 33 |
> > OK, sorry about not responding yesterday - I was asleep (different time |
| 34 |
> > zones). Anyway, I'll add this to incoming, hopefully since it's just an |
| 35 |
> > update it'll be into cvs in a day or two. |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> What I meant to say was, I can test compiling, but not much of usage. So we |
| 38 |
> should message a developer directly. |
| 39 |
A very final note: I *can* test this particular case, so I'll do so. What I |
| 40 |
said earlier was about incoming updates in general. Sorry, I'm just mentally |
| 41 |
disorganized right now. |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
-- |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
Dan Armak |
| 47 |
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team |
| 48 |
Matan, Israel |
Archives