1 |
On 09/06/2016 03:38 PM, M. J. Everitt wrote: |
2 |
> On 06/09/16 14:35, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: |
3 |
>> On 09/06/2016 03:19 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
4 |
>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
>>>> I believe you're overthinking it, if we make it a guideline to include a |
6 |
>>>> section of the eclass (as many already have) that does e.g (take this |
7 |
>>>> for example purposes) there is no EAPI/PMS change needed |
8 |
>>>> case "${EAPI:-0}" in |
9 |
>>>> 4|5|6) |
10 |
>>>> ;; |
11 |
>>>> *) die "EAPI=${EAPI} is not supported" ;; |
12 |
>>>> |
13 |
>>> I think the question becomes then what do we do about eclasses that |
14 |
>>> don't follow the guideline? |
15 |
>> A natural step might be QA team involved in such cases? |
16 |
>> |
17 |
> Did you just volunteer to join QA there, Kristian ?! ;) |
18 |
> |
19 |
|
20 |
hehe :) If they want me to contribute there they can ask. I'm certainly |
21 |
not fundamentally opposed, but I believe they overall have a good |
22 |
project going already so I'm allocating my (sadly resource constrained) |
23 |
Gentoo-time elsewhere. |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
27 |
OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net |
28 |
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 |