From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Should portage tree CVS impose a commit moratorium during snapshot creation? | ||
Date: | Wed, 09 Jan 2013 12:39:53 | ||
Message-Id: | 20130109123709.4fe98978@googlemail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Should portage tree CVS impose a commit moratorium during snapshot creation? by "Diego Elio Pettenò" |
1 | On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 13:23:13 +0100 |
2 | Diego Elio Pettenò <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu> wrote: |
3 | > PLEASE ALL STOP DETOURING EVERY DAMN TOPIC OUT THERE WITH THE GIT |
4 | > MIGRATION, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. |
5 | |
6 | Translation: "We all know that there are lots of things that would be a |
7 | hell of a lot easier if we weren't the only project in the world still |
8 | using CVS, but the Git migration is never going to happen, so |
9 | mentioning it just makes everyone angry." |
10 | |
11 | -- |
12 | Ciaran McCreesh |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Should portage tree CVS impose a commit moratorium during snapshot creation? | "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu> |