Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Should portage tree CVS impose a commit moratorium during snapshot creation?
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 12:39:53
Message-Id: 20130109123709.4fe98978@googlemail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Should portage tree CVS impose a commit moratorium during snapshot creation? by "Diego Elio Pettenò"
1 On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 13:23:13 +0100
2 Diego Elio Pettenò <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu> wrote:
3 > PLEASE ALL STOP DETOURING EVERY DAMN TOPIC OUT THERE WITH THE GIT
4 > MIGRATION, THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
5
6 Translation: "We all know that there are lots of things that would be a
7 hell of a lot easier if we weren't the only project in the world still
8 using CVS, but the Git migration is never going to happen, so
9 mentioning it just makes everyone angry."
10
11 --
12 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Should portage tree CVS impose a commit moratorium during snapshot creation? "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu>