| 1 |
On Wednesday 21 January 2004 02:42, Ryan Finnie wrote: |
| 2 |
> Today I tested (among others) clamav-0.65, a version bump that was added |
| 3 |
> yesterday. So I reported my success on each platform in bug #38876. It |
| 4 |
> was closed as resolved/invalid shortly later because of the fact that the |
| 5 |
> build was only submitted yesterday. I explained myself and SpanKY replied |
| 6 |
> with "so we'll add it in a few weeks, bug us then" and marked it |
| 7 |
> resolved/later. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I'm still trying to figure out the reasoning behind this. If the idea is |
| 10 |
> to not leave tickets open, what about the other 4758 open tickets? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
i think you're missing the point of the LATER resolution ... |
| 13 |
LATER means 'it will happen, just not now' ... which is why i said post on the |
| 14 |
bug again in a few weeks and we'll take a real look at it (following the |
| 15 |
policies mentioned in other e-mails on this thread) |
| 16 |
LATER doesnt mean 'about as much chance as a frozen day in hell' ... we use |
| 17 |
LATER to better help us track bugs, not to tell you to piss off ;) |
| 18 |
-mike |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives