Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@×××××.net>
To: Felipe Ghellar <fghellar2@×××××××××.br>, gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Changelog
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 02:48:07
Message-Id: 004201c2a708$b2dc1560$0101a8c0@cascade
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Changelog by Felipe Ghellar
1 Haha. :) There is only one entry in the change log and it is simply a
2 comment about sparc architecture tags.
3
4 Tom Veldhouse
5
6 ----- Original Message -----
7 From: "Felipe Ghellar" <fghellar2@×××××××××.br>
8 To: <gentoo-dev@g.o>
9 Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 7:52 PM
10 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Changelog
11
12
13 > The "Gentoo Linux Development Policy" document wrote:
14 >
15 > "Important: Whenever you create a new revision of an ebuild, be sure to
16 > update the ChangeLog file in the ebuild directory. Failing to do so is
17 > considered to be in very poor taste and many (sic) result in
18 > disciplinary action."
19 >
20 >
21 >
22 > Maik Schreiber wrote:
23 > >>The only version in /usr/portage/sys-apps/portage is
24 > >>portage-2.0.46-r2.ebuild, of which there is no entry in the ChangeLog,
25 > >>also the version that is currently installed portage-2.0.45-r5 doesn't
26 > >>have an entry in ChangeLog either, hmmmmmm
27 > >
28 > >
29 > > Although carpaski updates the "real" ChangeLog from time to time, it
30 seems to be out of sync quite often.
31 > >
32 >
33 > _______________________________________________________________________
34 > Busca Yahoo!
35 > O melhor lugar para encontrar tudo o que você procura na Internet
36 > http://br.busca.yahoo.com/
37 >
38 > --
39 > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
40 >
41 >
42
43
44
45 --
46 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list