| 1 |
El jue, 11-11-2021 a las 12:48 +0100, Ulrich Mueller escribió: |
| 2 |
> > > > > > On Thu, 11 Nov 2021, Florian Schmaus wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > > We could: |
| 5 |
> > > - Open some part of the range between 500 and 1000. For example, |
| 6 |
> > > 500..799, which would leave 200 IDs for dynamic allocation. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> > +1, since I am not aware of any significant downsides doing so. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> > Could you elaborate why the range 500-799 only leaves us with 200 IDs? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> We still need some range for dynamic allocation. Currently that is |
| 13 |
> 500..999, and would be reduced to 800..999. That seems to be on the low |
| 14 |
> side already. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> In any case, 300 additional IDs may not be future proof at the rate |
| 17 |
> we're currently allocating them. So I wonder if we shouldn't move to |
| 18 |
> above 60000 immediately, or alternatively, give up the whole concept. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Ulrich |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Personally I would move to >60000 and keep the 300 additional IDs for the case |
| 23 |
some software really really needs them |
Archives