| 1 |
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 05:26:19PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 12:54:26 -0500 |
| 4 |
> > Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> >> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 6:13 AM, konsolebox <konsolebox@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 7 |
> >> > Please consider promoting the use of tinfo flag in packages that |
| 8 |
> >> > depend on sys-libs/ncurses so that they would synchronize properly |
| 9 |
> >> > with sys-libs/ncurses[tinfo]. |
| 10 |
> >> |
| 11 |
> >> I would rather see the tinfo USE flag removed from ncurses. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > vapier doesn't consider this QA violation a QA violation. |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/487844 |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Perhaps QA could take some action then? |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Updating ~1500 ebuilds with a [tinfo=] use-dep seems like a poor solution. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
<qa hat on> |
| 22 |
Our policies are in the dev manual, so please cite the violation there. |
| 23 |
If you can't, this is not a qa violation, so please don't call it one. |
| 24 |
</qa hat> |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
I don't see a problem with the use flag and suggest updating the other ebuilds. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
William |
Archives