Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: x32 fun pants
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 05:54:51
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] x32 fun pants by Markos Chandras
Markos Chandras posted on Fri, 16 Sep 2011 21:25:07 +0300 as excerpted:

>> that would be ideal, and drop "amd64" in the process: x86/x86_64/ >> -mike > > Ok so we will probably have the following multilib options > > * x86(ABI=x86_32{/lib}) + amd64(ABI=x86_64{lib64/}) + > x32(ABI=x32{/libx32})
> * x86/amd64 ( what we already have in amd64 multilib )
This one would probably be x86/x86_64 , as Mike said drop amd64. (Tho I much prefer amd64, or if it's changed, something else without a _, which is hard to type, at least on the US/qwerty layout, requiring both hands to get the shift, and two rows up plus over to get the _, amd64 works quite nicely in that regard.)
> * x86/x32 > > and > > * x86 (no multilib for 32-bit processors ) ( what we already have in x86 > profile )
Don't forget current amd64/no-multilib. I guess that's be * x86/x86_64/no-multilb (Tho again, I'd prefer keeping amd64, for x86/amd64/no-multilib.) And presumably there's also be * x86/x32/no-multilib -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman